E
DM
O
ND
P
L
ANN
I
N
G
C
O
MM
I
SS
I
O
N
M
EE
T
I
N
G
Tu
es
d
ay
,
A
ugu
st
22
,
2006
5:30
P
.
M
.
T
he
E
dmond
P
lanning
Commission
Mee
t
ing
was
called
t
o
order
by
Chairperson
Leroy
Car
t
wrigh
t
a
t
5
:
30
p
.
m
.,
T
uesday
,
A
ugus
t
22
,
2006
,
in
t
he
Ci
t
y
Council
Chambers
a
t
20
E
lizabe
t
h
W
aner
.
P
resen
t f
or
t
he
Ci
t
y
were
Rober
t
L
.
S
chiermeyer
,
Ci
t
y
P
lanner
;
K
ris
t
i
McCone
,
A
ssis
t
an
t
Ci
t
y
P
lanner
;
Jan
Ramseyer-
F
ees
,
A
ssis
t
an
t
Ci
t
y
P
lanner
;
S
t
eve
Manek
,
Ci
t
y
E
ngineer
;
and
S
t
eve
Murdock
,
Ci
t
y
A
tt
orney
.
T
he
f
irs
t
i
t
em
on
t
he
agenda
was
t
he
approval
o
f t
he
A
ugus
t
8
,
2006
,
P
lanning
Commission
minu
t
es
.
Mo
t
ion
by
W
aner
,
seconded
by
Moyer
, t
o
approve
t
he
minu
t
es
as
wri
tt
en
.
M
o
t
i
on
carr
i
e
d
by
a
vo
t
e
o
f
5-0
as
f
ollows
:
AYES
:
Members
:
W
aner
,
Moyer
,
Moore
,
T
hrash
and
Chairperson
Car
t
wrigh
t
N
AYS
:
None
T
he
nex
t
i
t
em
on
t
he
agenda
was
Case
#
Z
060022
P
ub
li
c
Hear
i
ng
a
nd
C
on
s
i
d
erat
i
on
o
f
ame
nd
me
n
t
t
o
E
d
m
ond
P
l
a
n
III
fr
o
m
S
i
ng
l
e
F
am
il
y
D
w
e
lli
ng
t
o
Restr
i
cte
d
C
o
mmerc
i
a
l
Usa
g
e
l
o
cate
d
no
rt
h
o
f
Da
n
f
o
rt
h
at
1413
,
1431
,
1531
W
.
Da
n
f
o
rt
h
a
nd
1311
S
h
erry
L
a
n
e
.
(Cat
h
er
i
n
e
E
t
h
r
i
dg
e
,
F
re
n
c
h
P
r
op
ert
i
es
,
LL
C
,
P
h
illi
p
a
nd
Me
l
b
a
Cast
ill
o
a
nd
R
.
W
.
a
nd
S
u
e
Lu
te
–
P
l
aza
’
s
o
f
Ketc
h
Acres)
Randel
S
hadid
represen
t
ing
t
he
applican
t
s
has
amended
his
reques
t t
o
provide
t
he
only
o
t
her
use
t
han
o
ff
ices
f
or
t
hese
lo
t
s
would
be
f
or
an
op
t
ical
shop
.
T
he
reques
t
previously
excluded
some
re
t
ail
.
T
he
applica
t
ion
has
been
amended
f
or
o
ff
ices
.
T
he
curren
t
“
D-
O
”
Dis
t
ric
t
allows
op
t
ical
sales
wi
t
hin
a
clinic
no
t
visible
f
rom
t
he
adjacen
t
s
t
ree
t.
T
he
owners
may
be
planning
a
f
ree
s
t
anding
op
t
ical
shop
.
A
n
op
t
ician
is
allowed
in
“
D-
O
”
.
T
he
f
ollowing
general
planning
considera
t
ions
represen
t
some
o
f t
he
f
ac
t
ors
evalua
t
ed
in
reviewing
jus
t
i
f
ica
t
ions
f
or
P
lan
Map
A
mendmen
t
s
.
1
.
I
n
f
ras
t
ruc
t
ure
:
A
wa
t
er
line
is
loca
t
ed
t
o
t
he
sou
t
h
o
f t
his
proper
t
y
on
t
he
sou
t
h
side
o
f
Dan
f
or
t
h
.
F
or
commercial
cons
t
ruc
t
ion
and
possibly
conversion
o
f
any
home
t
o
commercial
,
a
new
wa
t
er
main
could
be
needed
on
t
he
nor
t
h
side
o
f
Dan
f
or
t
h
providing
t
he
adequa
t
e
supply
f
or
f
ire
pro
t
ec
t
ion
.
T
he
t
radi
t
ional
wa
t
er
t
ap
f
or
t
he
domes
t
ic
service
may
no
t
be
su
ff
icien
t
depending
on
which
“
D-1
”
use
is
cons
t
ruc
t
ed
,
f
or
example
,
res
t
auran
t
s
.
S
ani
t
ary
sewer
is
no
t
readily
available
. It
appears
t
he
sewer
lines
on
t
he
sou
t
h
side
o
f
Dan
f
or
t
h
near
t
he
f
ire
s
t
a
t
ion
are
no
t
deep
enough
t
o
serve
all
o
f t
he
proper
t
ies
involved
.
T
he
bes
t
solu
t
ion
indica
t
es
t
ha
t
a
sewer
line
ex
t
ends
t
o
t
he
eas
t
and
t
hen
connec
t
s
t
o
t
he
nor
t
heas
t t
o
an
ou
tf
all
sewer
line
.
T
he
s
t
a
ff
has
also
checked
t
he
line
dep
t
h
in
P
ebble
Creek
which
is
no
t
an
improvemen
t
over
a
sewer
line
ex
t
ension
f
rom
t
he
sou
t
h
side
o
f
Dan
f
or
t
h
.
S
ep
t
ic
t
anks
would
be
permi
tt
ed
f
or
o
ff
ice
uses
since
t
he
coverage
would
be
expec
t
ed
less
t
han
re
t
ail
.
T
he
land
use
will
have
t
o
accommoda
t
e
t
he
space
available
wi
t
h
building
,
paved
parking
and
la
t
eral
f
ields
.
187
P
lanning
Commission
188
A
ugus
t
22
,
2006
2
.
T
ra
ff
ic
:
A
pproxima
t
ely
20
,
000
cars
bo
t
h
direc
t
ions
along
Dan
f
or
t
h
per
day
.
T
he
road
has
been
f
our
laned
and
t
here
is
a
t
ra
ff
ic
ligh
t
a
t t
he
en
t
ry
t
o
t
he
S
ervice
B
lake
soccer
complex
.
3
.
E
xis
t
ing
zoning
pa
tt
ern
:
Nor
t
h
–
“
R-2
”
Urban
E
s
t
a
t
e
S
ou
t
h
–
“
A
”
S
ingle
F
amily
E
as
t
–
“
A
”
S
ingle
F
amily
W
es
t
–
“
A
”
S
ingle
F
amily
4
.
Land
Use
:
Nor
t
h
–
K
e
t
ch
A
cres
A
ddi
t
ion
single
f
amily
acreage
lo
t
s
S
ou
t
h
–
S
ervice
B
lake
soccer
complex
,
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
dmond
E
as
t
–
P
onyland
,
large
10
acre
t
rac
t
W
es
t
–
P
ebble
Creek
and
elec
t
ric
subs
t
a
t
ion
5
.
Densi
t
y
:
n
/
a
commercial
use
6
.
Land
ownership
pa
tt
ern
:
Nor
t
h
–
acreage
lo
t
s
40
,
000
square
f
ee
t
S
ou
t
h
–
large
ownership
,
soccer
f
ields
,
60
acres
E
as
t
–
large
ownership
10
acres
W
es
t
–
urban
lo
t
s
P
ebble
Creek
7
.
P
hysical
f
ea
t
ures
: t
hese
lo
t
s
are
in
a
buil
t
environmen
t
condi
t
ion
,
each
have
an
exis
t
ing
home
,
wa
t
er
well
and
sep
t
ic
t
ank
8
.
S
pecial
condi
t
ions
:
ligh
t
ed
soccer
f
ields
t
o
t
he
sou
t
h
9
.
Loca
t
ion
o
f
S
chools
and
S
chool
Land
:
Nor
t
h
high
school
3
/
4s
mile
t
o
t
he
eas
t,
John
Ross
E
lemen
t
ary
a
mile
nor
t
heas
t
10
.
Compa
t
ibili
t
y
t
o
E
dmond
P
lan
III:
t
he
P
lan
sugges
t
s
residen
t
ial
.
11
.
S
i
t
e
P
lan
Review
:
required
f
or
new
commercial
cons
t
ruc
t
ion
or
house
conversion
A
tt
orney
Randel
S
hadid
represen
t
ed
t
he
applican
t
s
reques
t
ing
“
D-1
”
P
UD
indica
t
ing
t
he
main
reason
f
or
t
he
re
t
ail
usage
was
f
or
an
op
t
ical
shop
.
O
t
her
commi
t
men
t
s
o
f t
he
P
UD
such
as
no
access
on
residen
t
ial
s
t
ree
t
s
would
s
t
ay
t
he
same
.
T
he
buildings
will
be
brick
or
s
t
one
.
S
usie
Lu
t
e
,
one
o
f t
he
proper
t
y
owners
o
f t
he
houses
,
spoke
in
f
avor
indica
t
ing
i
t
was
ex
t
remely
di
ff
icul
t t
o
access
Dan
f
or
t
h
, t
ha
t t
he
Ci
t
y
had
slowly
grown
up
around
t
his
area
wi
t
h
more
noise
,
ligh
t
s
, t
ra
ff
ic
and
was
t
ime
f
or
a
change
f
rom
S
ingle
F
amily
homes
.
T
he
s
t
ree
t
is
no
longer
sa
f
e
t
o
have
a
home
on
i
t.
B
ill
W
es
t,
1700
S
herry
Lane
,
spoke
in
opposi
t
ion
indica
t
ing
t
ha
t
businesses
will
make
t
he
s
t
ree
t
s
even
more
dangerous
.
He
did
no
t
wan
t
any
re
t
ail
using
residen
t
ial
s
t
ree
t
s
which
t
hey
may
be
t
emp
t
ed
t
o
do
even
wi
t
h
no
curb
cu
t
s
on
Dan
f
or
t
h
jus
t t
o
circula
t
e
around
t
he
area
during
t
imes
o
f
conges
t
ion
.
He
expressed
concern
abou
t
Mr
.
F
rench
’
s
me
t
al
buildings
which
may
a
tt
emp
t t
o
be
used
f
or
commercial
when
t
hey
are
ac
t
ually
used
f
or
s
t
orage
a
t t
his
t
ime
.
Mr
.
W
es
t f
el
t
i
f t
hey
were
t
o
drill
addi
t
ional
wells
, t
ha
t
would
a
ff
ec
t t
he
wa
t
er
t
able
in
t
he
area
which
is
already
P
lanning
Commission
189
A
ugus
t
22
,
2006
low
.
T
hey
may
wan
t t
o
drill
wells
t
o
wa
t
er
t
he
landscaping
.
Commission
Chairperson
Car
t
wrigh
t
commen
t
ed
t
ha
t t
he
buildings
would
have
t
o
connec
t t
o
ci
t
y
wa
t
er
.
Mr
.
W
es
t
indica
t
ed
41
persons
are
opposed
t
o
t
his
zoning
in
t
he
K
e
t
ch
A
cres
A
ddi
t
ion
.
Ronnie
W
illiams
wi
t
h
t
he
E
N
A
indica
t
ed
t
here
are
covenan
t
s
t
ha
t
res
t
ric
t
commercial
uses
.
He
indica
t
ed
i
t
seemed
inappropria
t
e
f
or
t
he
Ci
t
y
t
o
approve
zoning
which
requires
t
he
residen
t
s
t
o
sue
t
o
en
f
orce
even
t
hough
t
he
Ci
t
y
is
no
t
bound
by
t
he
covenan
t
s
since
t
hey
were
no
t
a
par
t
y
t
o
t
hem
.
Mr
.
S
hadid
indica
t
ed
t
his
was
a
very
reasonable
use
across
f
rom
t
he
soccer
f
ields
and
based
on
t
he
commercial
near
t
he
corner
a
t
K
elly
and
Dan
f
or
t
h
immedia
t
ely
t
o
t
he
eas
t.
T
he
t
ra
ff
ic
alone
wi
t
h
lo
t
s
f
ron
t
ing
a
busy
s
t
ree
t
was
appropria
t
e
jus
t
i
f
ica
t
ion
.
T
he
developer
had
commi
tt
ed
no
t t
o
use
S
herry
and
Carol
Drive
which
are
t
he
residen
t
ial
s
t
ree
t
s
adjacen
t t
o
t
he
lo
t
s
.
Mr
.
Car
t
wrigh
t
asked
i
f
Mr
.
S
hadid
was
f
amiliar
wi
t
h
t
he
covenan
t
s
;
he
indica
t
ed
he
was
.
He
indica
t
ed
t
he
covenan
t
s
were
no
t
a
concern
t
o
t
he
P
lanning
Commission
or
t
he
Ci
t
y
Council
and
t
he
Ci
t
y
would
no
t
be
able
t
o
en
f
orce
t
he
covenan
t
s
.
Commissioner
T
hrash
asked
abou
t t
he
bu
ff
er
be
t
ween
t
he
proposed
o
ff
ice
uses
and
t
he
homes
t
o
t
he
nor
t
h
. It
was
indica
t
ed
t
ha
t
would
be
a
sensi
t
ive
border
area
requiring
addi
t
ional
se
t
back
and
landscaping
.
It
was
no
t
ed
t
ha
t
drives
t
o
t
he
F
rench
s
t
orage
buildings
would
remain
on
S
herry
Lane
as
long
as
t
he
buildings
con
t
inue
t
o
be
used
as
s
t
orage
only
.
Commissioner
W
aner
was
concerned
abou
t
access
on
Dan
f
or
t
h
and
t
he
proper
t
y
nex
t t
o
t
he
subs
t
a
t
ion
.
Commissioner
Moore
agreed
t
ha
t t
he
op
t
ician
would
genera
t
e
more
t
ra
ff
ic
.
Chairperson
Car
t
wrigh
t
indica
t
ed
a
t
some
poin
t t
his
area
would
change
and
t
ha
t t
his
was
a
limi
t
ed
approach
.
Mo
t
ion
by
Moore
,
seconded
by
W
aner
, t
o
approve
t
his
reques
t.
M
o
t
i
on
d
e
n
i
e
d
by
a
vo
t
e
o
f
2-3
as
f
ollows
:
AYES
:
Members
:
Moyer
and
Chairperson
Car
t
wrigh
t
N
AYS
:
Moore
,
W
aner
and
T
hrash
T
he
nex
t
i
t
em
on
t
he
agenda
was
Case
#
Z
060023
P
ub
li
c
Hear
i
ng
a
nd
C
on
s
i
d
erat
i
on
o
f
rez
on
i
ng
fr
o
m
“
R-2
”
Ur
b
a
n
E
state
D
w
e
lli
ng
t
o
“
D-1
”
Restr
i
cte
d
C
o
mmerc
i
a
l
P
l
a
nn
e
d
U
n
i
t
Deve
l
op
me
n
t
l
o
cate
d
no
rt
h
o
f
Da
n
f
o
rt
h
at
1413
,
1431
,
1531
W
.
Da
n
f
o
rt
h
a
nd
1311
S
h
erry
L
a
n
e
.
(Cat
h
er
i
n
e
E
t
h
r
i
dg
e
,
F
re
n
c
h
P
r
op
ert
i
es
,
LL
C
,
P
h
illi
p
a
nd
Me
l
b
a
Cast
ill
o
a
nd
R
.
W
.
a
nd
S
u
e
Lu
te
–
P
l
aza
’
s
o
f
Ketc
h
Acres)
A
tt
orney
Randel
S
hadid
has
amended
t
he
reques
t f
or
t
he
lo
t
s
in
K
e
t
ch
A
cres
t
o
provide
f
or
o
ff
ices
wi
t
h
t
he
excep
t
ion
o
f
an
op
t
ical
sales
.
A
n
op
t
ician
where
eyes
are
t
es
t
ed
or
t
rea
t
ed
and
prescrip
t
ions
wri
tt
en
is
a
use
permi
tt
ed
in
“
D-
O
”
S
uburban
O
ff
ice
.
A
n
op
t
ical
shop
is
also
allowed
in
“
D-
O
”
as
long
as
t
here
is
no
visibili
t
y
f
rom
t
he
s
t
ree
t
and
i
t
is
loca
t
ed
en
t
irely
wi
t
hin
t
he
clinic
.
T
he
P
lanning
Commission
may
wish
t
o
reques
t
i
f t
he
applica
t
ion
could
be
amended
t
o
a
lesser
dis
t
ric
t t
han
t
he
“
D-1
”
P
UD
such
as
“
D-
O
”
.
T
his
would
be
consis
t
en
t
wi
t
h
t
he
policy
de
t
ermina
t
ion
reached
by
t
he
P
lanning
Commission
regarding
t
he
K
ang
rezoning
. If
a
f
ree
s
t
anding
op
t
ical
shop
is
needed
, t
ha
t
does
require
t
he
re
t
ail
dis
t
ric
t
and
t
he
mos
t
res
t
ric
t
ive
is
“
D-1
”
.
P
lanning
Commission
190
A
ugus
t
22
,
2006
Mo
t
ion
by
Moyer
,
seconded
by
T
hrash
, t
o
approve
t
his
reques
t.
M
o
t
i
on
d
e
n
i
e
d
by
a
vo
t
e
o
f
2-3
as
f
ollows
:
AYES
:
Members
:
Moyer
and
Chairperson
Car
t
wrigh
t
N
AYS
:
T
hrash
,
W
aner
and
Moore
T
he
nex
t
i
t
em
on
t
he
agenda
was
Case
#
SP
060037
P
ub
li
c
Hear
i
ng
a
nd
C
on
s
i
d
erat
i
on
o
f
c
o
mmerc
i
a
l
s
i
te
p
l
a
n
a
pp
r
o
va
l
f
o
r
a
n
o
ff
i
ce
bu
il
d
i
ng
on
t
h
e
w
est
s
i
d
e
o
f
t
h
e
W
est
I
-35
F
r
on
ta
g
e
R
o
a
d
1
/
8
t
h
m
il
e
no
rt
h
o
f
33
r
d
S
treet
.
(
O
k
l
a
ho
ma
M
un
i
c
i
p
a
l
P
o
w
er
A
u
t
ho
r
i
ty)
G
eneral
S
i
t
e
Cri
t
eria
:
E
xis
t
ing
zoning
–
“
D-3
”
O
ff
ice
Commercial
S
e
t
backs
–
f
ron
t f
rom
t
he
proper
t
y
line
along
I
-35
is
96
f
ee
t,
proper
t
y
line
t
o
t
he
wes
t t
o
t
he
neares
t
building
is
115
f
ee
t,
se
t
back
t
o
t
he
nor
t
h
is
80
f
ee
t
and
se
t
back
t
o
t
he
sou
t
h
is
370
f
ee
t.
Heigh
t
o
f
buildings
–
36
f
ee
t, t
he
building
does
mee
t t
he
addi
t
ional
se
t
back
required
o
f
1
f
oo
t f
or
each
2
f
oo
t t
ha
t t
he
building
exceeds
35
f
ee
t
in
heigh
t.
T
he
building
is
spli
t
level
and
is
ac
t
ually
3
s
t
ories
in
heigh
t f
or
some
par
t
s
o
f t
he
s
t
ruc
t
ure
.
Parking
–
85 parking spaces are shown on the plans, the building is 16,000 square
feet.
Lot size
–
6.84 acres
1
.
Landscape
P
lan
–
Landscaping
-
Lo
t
area
=
298
,
273
s
f
Landscape
provided
on
plans
submi
tt
ed
22
½
%
percen
t
o
f
lo
t
=
67
,
111
s
f
70
,
567
s
f
preserva
t
ion
area
P
lan
t
uni
t
s
required
=
10
,
738
P
U
13
,
527
plan
t
uni
t
s
E
vergreen
required
=
4
,
295
P
U
0
plan
t
uni
t
s
Requiremen
t
s
in
f
ron
t
=
5
,
369
P
U
7
,
515
plan
t
uni
t
s
=
33
,
556
s
f
38
,
900
s
f
O
M
PA
is
preserving
approxima
t
ely
1
.
62
acres
o
f
Cross
T
imbers
f
ores
t
across
t
heir
si
t
e
.
T
he
preserva
t
ion
is
divided
in
t
o
4
separa
t
e
s
t
ands
;
one
in
t
he
sou
t
heas
t
corner
o
f t
he
si
t
e
,
and
t
he
o
t
her
t
hree
surrounding
t
he
building
and
parking
lo
t
on
t
he
wes
t,
nor
t
h
,
and
eas
t.
T
he
sou
t
h
and
sou
t
hwes
t
corner
o
f t
he
si
t
e
are
no
t
being
coun
t
ed
t
owards
preserva
t
ion
due
t
o
t
he
de
t
en
t
ion
pond
and
sep
t
ic
sys
t
em
f
ield
being
loca
t
ed
in
t
hese
areas
.
However
, t
hey
have
in
t
en
t
ions
o
f t
ransplan
t
ing
some
o
f t
he
E
as
t
ern
Red
Cedars
in
t
hese
areas
t
o
areas
around
t
he
building
. I
n
addi
t
ion
, t
hey
are
proposing
some
new
landscaping
.
None
o
f t
he
new
landscaping
or
t
ransplan
t
ed
t
rees
is
being
coun
t
ed
t
owards
t
heir
landscaping
requiremen
t
s
a
t t
his
t
ime
.
Due
t
o
t
he
amoun
t
o
f
preserva
t
ion
on
t
he
si
t
e
,
i
t
is
reques
t
ed
t
ha
t t
hey
receive
a
variance
on
t
he
evergreen
requiremen
t.
2
.
Ligh
t
ing
P
lan
–
t
his
loca
t
ion
is
in
t
he
I
-35
Corridor
and
ligh
t
poles
canno
t
exceed
24
f
oo
t
in
heigh
t
including
t
he
base
and
mus
t
be
down
direc
t
ed
shoebox
s
t
yle
ligh
t
s
, t
hey
P
lanning
Commission
191
A
ugus
t
22
,
2006
canno
t
be
decora
t
ive
.
T
he
ligh
t
s
will
be
loca
t
ed
in
t
he
t
ree
areas
t
o
f
i
t
wi
t
h
t
he
landscaping
.
3
.
Driveways
/
P
arking
–
one
drive
approach
is
planned
along
t
he
I
-35
F
ron
t
age
Road
.
4
.
Mechanical
equipmen
t
–
t
he
roo
f
is
f
la
t
bu
t t
his
projec
t
plans
a
geo
t
hermal
cooling
and
hea
t
ing
sys
t
em
so
t
here
will
be
no
equipmen
t
loca
t
ed
on
t
he
roo
f
o
f t
he
building
.
T
he
lab
building
has
a
pi
t
ched
roo
f
loca
t
ed
t
o
t
he
wes
t
o
f t
he
main
building
and
t
here
will
be
no
mechanical
equipmen
t
on
t
ha
t
roo
f
ei
t
her
.
5
.
F
encing
/
screening
–
no
sigh
t f
encing
is
proposed
.
Chain
link
will
be
used
t
o
secure
t
he
si
t
e
.
T
he
proper
t
y
t
o
t
he
wes
t
is
zoned
S
ingle
F
amily
bu
t t
here
is
a
undis
t
urbed
t
ree
area
le
ft
on
t
he
wes
t
o
f t
he
proper
t
y
wes
t
o
f t
he
building
.
6
.
S
ignage
–
t
he
one
ground
sign
is
48
square
f
ee
t
cons
t
ruc
t
ed
on
a
brick
columned
s
t
ruc
t
ure
.
T
hi
s
is
much
less
t
han
allowed
on
I
-35
wi
t
h
t
he
leng
t
h
o
f f
ron
t
age
t
his
proper
t
y
has
.
7
.
G
eneral
archi
t
ec
t
ural
appearance
–
t
he
building
appearance
provides
f
or
a
combina
t
ion
o
f
brick
,
s
t
one
and
glass
wi
t
h
a
f
la
t
roo
f.
8
.
Drainage
Repor
t
and
rela
t
ed
G
rading
Repor
t
P
lans
–
drainage
de
t
en
t
ion
is
being
me
t
on
t
he
sou
t
h
side
o
f t
he
building
and
parking
area
.
9
.
Re
f
use
f
acili
t
ies
–
t
he
dumps
t
er
enclosure
is
loca
t
ed
be
t
ween
t
he
main
building
and
t
he
lab
.
T
his
loca
t
ion
will
no
t
be
seen
by
residen
t
s
or
t
ravelers
along
I
-35
.
10
.
S
ensi
t
ive
borders
–
t
here
is
a
sensi
t
ive
border
t
o
t
he
wes
t;
as
indica
t
ed
, t
he
se
t
back
is
115
f
ee
t, t
he
minimum
se
t
back
in
“
D-3
”
is
20
f
ee
t, t
he
sensi
t
ive
border
se
t
back
and
landscaping
o
f
50%
more
has
been
me
t.
T
he
overall
landscaping
is
22
½
%
a
t t
his
loca
t
ion
.
8
.
S
t
ree
t
paving
and
access
managemen
t
–
no
s
t
ree
t
paving
is
required
along
t
he
F
ron
t
age
Road
,
more
drives
could
be
approved
wi
t
h
t
he
amoun
t
o
f f
ron
t
age
.
T
he
proper
t
y
will
be
secured
and
ga
t
ed
.
9
.
T
i
t
le
21
W
a
t
er
and
S
ani
t
ary
S
ewer
P
lans
–
Ci
t
y
wa
t
er
is
available
along
I
-35
and
will
be
connec
t
ed
f
or
service
.
No
ci
t
y
sewer
is
available
.
T
his
si
t
e
required
ex
t
ra
land
based
on
t
he
aerobic
sys
t
em
and
sensi
t
ive
border
.
Mr
.
S
peegle
indica
t
ed
t
hey
had
t
alked
t
o
t
he
neighbors
abou
t t
he
f
encing
and
t
ree
preserva
t
ion
.
T
he
plans
me
t
all
t
he
I
-35
Corridor
s
t
andards
and
t
he
building
was
o
f
very
high
quali
t
y
jus
t
like
previously
approved
.
No
one
appeared
in
objec
t
ion
.
Mo
t
ion
by
Moore
,
seconded
by
Moyer
, t
o
approve
t
his
reques
t.
M
o
t
i
on
carr
i
e
d
by
a
vo
t
e
o
f
5-0
as
f
ollows
:
AYES
:
Members
:
Moore
,
Moyer
,
T
hrash
,
W
aner
and
Chairperson
Car
t
wrigh
t
N
AYS
:
None
T
he
nex
t
i
t
em
on
t
he
agenda
was
C
ase
#
Z
060062
P
ub
li
c
Hear
i
ng
a
nd
C
on
s
i
d
erat
i
on
o
f
ame
nd
me
n
t
t
o
C
h
i
s
ho
l
m
L
ake
To
w
nhou
se
P
l
a
nn
e
d
U
n
i
t
Deve
l
op
me
n
t
Des
i
gn
S
tateme
n
t
on
t
h
e
s
ou
t
h
s
i
d
e
o
f
W
est
E
d
m
ond
R
o
a
d
,
east
o
f
t
h
e
I
n
s
p
i
rat
i
on
s
T
ea
P
lanning
Commission
192
A
ugus
t
22
,
2006
R
oo
m
,
w
est
o
f
t
h
e
J
i
m
Brya
n
I
n
s
u
ra
n
ce
O
ff
i
ce
a
nd
t
h
e
L
a
u
re
l
C
ou
rt
Deve
l
op
me
n
t
.
(J
ohn
G
rav
i
tt)
John
G
ravi
tt
and
Chris
t
ine
S
eo
have
recen
t
ly
purchased
Common
A
reas
C
and
D
in
Chisholm
Lake
T
ownhomes
S
ec
t
ion
O
ne
.
T
he
proper
t
y
owners
would
like
t
o
build
a
duplex
on
Common
A
rea
C
and
a
single
f
amily
home
on
Common
A
rea
D
.
T
hese
proper
t
ies
were
designa
t
ed
as
common
areas
f
or
t
he
addi
t
ion
when
t
he
proper
t
y
was
originally
zoned
t
o
“
C-2
”
P
UD
Medium
Densi
t
y
Mul
t
i-
F
amily
P
lanned
Uni
t
Developmen
t
in
1980
.
T
he
P
lanned
Uni
t
Developmen
t
Design
S
t
a
t
emen
t
s
t
a
t
es
t
ha
t
no
common
areas
are
planned
when
i
t
was
wri
tt
en
be
f
ore
t
he
proper
t
y
was
rezoned
,
al
t
hough
when
t
he
proper
t
y
was
pla
tt
ed
in
1982
a
ft
er
t
he
rezoning
, t
he
addi
t
ion
con
t
ained
f
our
common
areas
, t
wo
being
connec
t
ed
t
o
t
he
de
t
en
t
ion
f
or
t
he
addi
t
ion
. If t
his
reques
t
is
approved
,
t
he
s
t
a
ff
sugges
t
s
t
he
f
ollowing
s
t
eps
be
used
t
o
ac
t
ually
develop
t
hese
t
wo
common
area
.
F
irs
t, t
he
proper
t
y
owners
need
t
o
amend
t
he
design
s
t
a
t
emen
t t
o
re
f
lec
t t
ha
t
common
areas
originally
pla
tt
ed
are
proposed
t
o
be
buil
t
on
(
t
ha
t
is
t
he
reques
t
curren
t
ly
be
f
ore
t
he
P
lanning
Commission)
.
S
econdly
, t
hese
lo
t
s
mus
t
be
re
-
pla
tt
ed
which
would
include
a
hydraulic
s
t
udy
o
f t
he
en
t
ire
addi
t
ion
as
well
as
a
s
t
udy
o
f t
he
drainage
impac
t
on
t
he
adjacen
t
lo
t
s
.
T
here
is
a
problem
t
o
t
he
wes
t
where
a
f
ounda
t
ion
has
been
buil
t
lower
t
han
t
he
surrounding
proper
t
y
and
t
he
owner
has
reques
t
ed
assis
t
ance
t
hrough
t
he
S
t
orm
W
a
t
er
A
dvisory
B
oard
.
A
ddi
t
ionally
,
Common
A
rea
D
con
t
ains
a
u
t
ili
t
y
easemen
t t
ha
t
crosses
t
he
lo
t
wi
t
h
an
elec
t
ric
line
in
i
t,
which
will
have
t
o
be
closed
/
vaca
t
ed
and
t
he
line
reloca
t
ed
,
a
t t
he
owner
’
s
expense
.
T
he
developmen
t
o
f
t
hese
common
areas
presen
t
s
a
challenge
f
or
t
he
proper
t
y
owner
who
purchased
t
he
land
a
t
a
sheri
ff
’
s
sale
.
A
ft
er
t
his
developmen
t
was
s
t
ar
t
ed
in
t
he
1980
’
s
by
Leadership
P
roper
t
ies
,
i
t
sa
t
mos
t
ly
undeveloped
f
or
many
years
,
wi
t
h
t
he
Ci
t
y
having
t
o
mow
and
main
t
ain
t
he
vacan
t
lo
t
s
.
E
ven
t
ually
, t
he
projec
t
was
comple
t
ed
wi
t
h
single
f
amily
homes
,
duplexes
, t
ri-plex
uni
t
s
in
Chisholm
Lake
T
ownhomes
S
ec
t
ion
I.
T
he
original
addi
t
ions
;
Chisholm
Lake
T
ownhomes
I
and
II,
proposed
142
uni
t
s
and
t
he
projec
t
now
con
t
ains
107
uni
t
s
,
wi
t
h
Chisholm
Lake
T
ownhomes
II
being
all
single
f
amily
residences
.
T
he
densi
t
y
o
f t
he
projec
t
is
less
t
han
originally
proposed
bu
t
bo
t
h
common
areas
have
res
t
ric
t
ions
t
ha
t
do
no
t
lead
t
o
easy
developmen
t
o
f t
he
areas
.
T
he
developer
proposes
a
duplex
,
1500
square
f
oo
t
per
side
, f
or
Common
A
rea
C
,
which
would
have
access
o
ff t
he
priva
t
e
alley
since
t
here
is
only
10
’
o
f f
ron
t
age
on
t
o
Longhorn
.
T
his
would
pu
t t
he
rear
o
f
t
he
s
t
ruc
t
ure
along
t
he
public
s
t
ree
t,
when
all
t
he
o
t
her
residences
f
ron
t
on
t
o
Longhorn
.
T
his
lo
t
also
si
t
s
higher
t
han
t
hose
uni
t
s
along
A
bilene
,
and
so
t
he
drainage
will
have
t
o
be
evalua
t
ed
closely
so
as
no
t t
o
aggrava
t
e
an
exis
t
ing
drainage
problem
.
T
he
developer
proposes
a
single
f
amily
residence
,
1400-1700
square
f
ee
t, f
or
Common
A
rea
D
,
wi
t
h
t
he
access
o
ff
F
ox
F
ire
Road
.
A
gain
, t
his
s
t
ruc
t
ure
is
proposed
t
o
f
ron
t
on
t
o
F
ox
F
ire
Road
no
t
Laria
t
Circle
as
o
t
her
residences
do
.
T
his
lo
t
will
have
t
o
have
a
u
t
ili
t
y
line
reloca
t
ed
, t
he
easemen
t
closed
and
vaca
t
ed
and
a
variance
f
or
t
he
drive
approach
due
t
o
t
he
close
proximi
t
y
t
o
E
dmond
Road
.
A
Communi
t
y
Connec
t
ion
mee
t
ing
was
held
on
A
ugus
t
1
,
2006
t
o
discuss
t
his
proposal
.
T
en
ci
t
izens
were
presen
t
a
t t
he
mee
t
ing
and
P
lanning
Commission
193
A
ugus
t
22
,
2006
t
he
minu
t
es
f
or
t
he
mee
t
ing
are
a
tt
ached
. It
appeared
t
ha
t
mos
t
ci
t
izens
o
f t
he
area
would
be
happy
t
o
have
s
t
ruc
t
ures
on
t
hese
common
lo
t
s
so
as
no
t t
o
con
t
inue
t
o
be
a
nuisance
,
bu
t
expressed
concerns
regarding
size
and
scale
o
f t
he
s
t
ruc
t
ures
proposed
,
access
t
o
t
he
proper
t
ies
,
and
drainage
.
T
here
was
qui
t
e
a
bi
t
o
f
discussion
concerning
t
he
non
manda
t
ory
homeowner
associa
t
ion
f
or
t
his
addi
t
ion
,
bu
t
no
resolu
t
ion
o
f t
his
issue
was
discussed
.
Mr
.
G
ravi
tt
indica
t
ed
he
unders
t
ood
all
o
f t
he
addi
t
ional
s
t
eps
he
would
have
t
o
go
t
hrough
t
o
ac
t
ually
build
on
t
hese
lo
t
s
.
Commissioner
T
hrash
expressed
concern
abou
t
changing
P
UDs
especially
per
t
aining
t
o
t
he
open
space
.
Robin
E
dwards
on
O
ld
B
ugle
indica
t
ed
she
was
concerned
abou
t t
he
driveway
planned
on
F
ox
F
ire
on
t
he
en
t
rance
t
o
E
dmond
Road
.
June
F
riger
was
concerned
abou
t
some
t
hing
being
buil
t
on
t
he
proper
t
y
.
Residen
t
s
were
always
t
old
no
t
hing
would
be
buil
t
on
t
hese
lo
t
s
.
Chairperson
Car
t
wrigh
t
was
concerned
abou
t
no
one
t
aking
responsibili
t
y
t
o
main
t
ain
t
hese
proper
t
ies
.
He
no
t
ed
i
t
con
t
inues
t
o
happen
in
several
di
ff
eren
t
addi
t
ions
where
t
here
may
no
t
be
a
manda
t
ory
homeowners
associa
t
ion
s
t
ill
working
.
Ronnie
W
illiams
wi
t
h
E
N
A
indica
t
ed
he
f
el
t t
his
was
t
he
f
irs
t t
ime
t
his
had
happened
.
Commissioner
Moore
indica
t
ed
t
his
was
a
mess
because
t
here
were
di
ff
eren
t
homeowners
associa
t
ions
and
di
ff
eren
t
levels
o
f
par
t
icipa
t
ion
as
well
as
di
ff
eren
t
improvemen
t
s
f
or
each
t
o
main
t
ain
. It
was
no
t
ed
t
ha
t t
he
common
area
f
or
t
he
de
t
en
t
ion
had
been
sold
t
o
ano
t
her
par
t
y
and
was
over
grown
wi
t
h
weeds
. It
appeared
t
he
lake
a
t t
he
sou
t
h
end
o
f t
he
addi
t
ion
nex
t t
o
t
he
high
school
was
being
cared
f
or
by
a
di
ff
eren
t
group
and
t
he
bulk
o
f t
he
residen
t
s
in
Chisholm
Lake
were
no
t
con
t
ribu
t
ing
t
o
t
he
de
t
en
t
ion
area
t
ha
t
bene
f
i
t
ed
t
heir
homes
.
Commissioner
W
aner
indica
t
ed
t
his
was
a
very
dangerous
preceden
t
.
Commissioner
Moyer
indica
t
ed
he
was
surprised
by
t
he
si
t
ua
t
ion
and
t
ha
t
he
couldn
’
t
suppor
t
allowing
t
he
homes
t
o
help
solve
t
he
problem
.
Commissioner
T
hrash
indica
t
ed
she
couldn
’
t
suppor
t t
he
si
t
ua
t
ion
ei
t
her
t
o
build
on
t
he
open
space
se
t
aside
f
or
t
his
addi
t
ion
.
Mo
t
ion
by
T
hrash
,
seconded
by
Moore
, t
o
approve
t
his
reques
t.
M
o
t
i
on
d
e
n
i
e
d
by
a
vo
t
e
o
f
1
-4
as
f
ollows
:
AYES
:
Members
:
Chairperson
Car
t
wrigh
t
N
AYS
:
T
hrash
,
Moore
,
W
aner
,
Moyer
T
he
nex
t
i
t
em
on
t
he
agenda
was
Case
#
Z
060060
P
ub
li
c
Hear
i
ng
a
nd
C
on
s
i
d
erat
i
on
o
f
ame
nd
me
n
t
t
o
E
d
m
ond
P
l
a
n
III
fr
o
m
Restr
i
cte
d
C
o
mmerc
i
a
l
a
nd
S
ubu
r
b
a
n
O
ff
i
ce
P
l
a
nn
e
d
U
n
i
t
Deve
l
op
me
n
t
t
o
Restr
i
cte
d
C
o
mmerc
i
a
l
P
l
a
nn
e
d
U
n
i
t
Deve
l
op
me
n
t
Usa
g
e
no
rt
h
o
f
W
est
E
d
m
ond
R
o
a
d
,
½
m
il
e
w
est
o
f
Ke
ll
y
.
(D
oo
l
ey
F
arms
,
LL
C)
T
he
f
ollowing
general
planning
considera
t
ions
represen
t
some
o
f t
he
f
ac
t
ors
evalua
t
ed
in
reviewing
jus
t
i
f
ica
t
ions
f
or
P
lan
Map
A
mendmen
t
s
.
P
lanning
Commission
194
A
ugus
t
22
,
2006
1
.
I
n
f
ras
t
ruc
t
ure
:
T
his
loca
t
ion
is
adjacen
t t
o
ci
t
y
wa
t
er
and
sewer
along
W
es
t
E
dmond
Road
,
Dooley
F
arms
Lane
and
t
he
creek
area
t
o
t
he
nor
t
hwes
t
o
f t
he
si
t
e
.
No
changes
would
be
planned
t
o
t
he
creek
area
since
all
t
he
de
t
en
t
ion
and
drainage
s
t
ruc
t
ure
improvemen
t
s
have
been
comple
t
ed
wi
t
h
t
he
ini
t
ial
cons
t
ruc
t
ion
.
2
.
T
ra
ff
ic
:
24
,
000
cars
a
day
bo
t
h
direc
t
ions
along
W
es
t
E
dmond
Road
.
3
.
E
xis
t
ing
zoning
pa
tt
ern
:
Nor
t
h
–
Mul
t
i-
f
amily
and
t
he
creek
area
adjacen
t t
o
K
imberly
Crossing
S
ou
t
h
–
“
C-2
”
and
“
D-
O
”
E
as
t
–
“
D-1
”
P
UD
W
es
t
–
“
D-1
”
P
UD
4
.
Land
Use
:
Nor
t
h
–
undeveloped
S
ou
t
h
–
Jim
B
ryan
I
nsurance
O
ff
ice
,
Chisholm
Lake
A
ddi
t
ion
E
as
t
–
undeveloped
W
es
t
–
S
t
eve
’
s
Rib
5
.
Densi
t
y
:
N
/
A
6
.
Land
ownership
pa
tt
ern
:
Nor
t
h
–
same
owner
Dooley
F
arms
,
LLC
S
ou
t
h
–
Jim
B
rian
and
Chisholm
Lake
homes
E
as
t
–
Dooley
F
arms
LLC
W
es
t
–
S
t
eve
’
s
Rib
7
.
P
hysical
f
ea
t
ures
: t
he
land
has
been
graded
f
or
developmen
t.
T
here
are
no
t
rees
on
t
he
majori
t
y
o
f t
he
proper
t
y
.
T
here
are
t
rees
along
t
he
creek
which
will
no
t
be
dis
t
urbed
.
8
.
S
pecial
condi
t
ions
:
None
9
.
Loca
t
ion
o
f
S
chools
and
S
chool
Land
: t
he
neares
t
school
is
S
an
t
a
F
e
High
S
chool
and
I
da
F
reeman
E
lemen
t
ary
S
chool
10
.
Compa
t
ibili
t
y
t
o
E
dmond
P
lan
III:
t
he
plan
re
f
lec
t
s
t
he
curren
t
zoning
o
f t
he
proper
t
y
f
rom
t
he
original
P
UD
.
T
his
parcel
is
be
t
ween
2
re
t
ail
loca
t
ions
and
is
a
modera
t
e
use
P
UD
wi
t
h
considera
t
ion
t
o
t
he
design
appearance
f
or
t
he
proposed
s
t
ruc
t
ures
.
11
.
S
i
t
e
P
lan
Review
:
S
i
t
e
P
lan
review
would
be
required
as
well
as
t
he
pla
t.
B
rian
Coon
represen
t
ing
t
he
owners
reques
t
ed
approval
o
f
addi
t
ional
re
t
ail
developed
in
a
P
UD
.
T
his
P
UD
would
include
limi
t
a
t
ions
t
o
monumen
t
signs
only
even
t
hough
t
aller
signs
are
permi
tt
ed
on
W
es
t
E
dmond
Road
.
Residen
t
ial
scale
buildings
wi
t
h
brick
veneer
and
pi
t
ched
roo
f
s
and
in
t
erconnec
t
ion
o
f
all
t
he
driveways
and
no
addi
t
ional
curb
cu
t
s
on
E
dmond
Road
t
hen
approved
wi
t
h
t
he
pla
t
o
f t
he
Dooley
F
arms
B
usiness
P
ark
.
S
t
eve
S
eikel
wi
t
h
S
t
eve
’
s
Rib
indica
t
ed
he
had
concerns
abou
t t
he
arrangemen
t
o
f t
he
P
UD
P
lan
since
t
he
buildings
were
pushed
close
t
o
E
dmond
Road
wi
t
h
a
number
o
f
small
parking
lo
t
s
.
He
f
el
t t
ha
t
res
t
auran
t
s
would
be
an
impor
t
an
t
use
in
t
his
projec
t
and
more
parking
would
be
needed
f
or
res
t
auran
t
s
no
t
spread
over
t
he
en
t
ire
area
.
Mr
.
S
eikel
presen
t
ed
several
examples
o
f
how
t
he
area
migh
t
be
recon
f
igured
.
Doug
G
lenn
f
rom
P
lanning
Commission
195
A
ugus
t
22
,
2006
t
he
Copper
f
ield
A
ddi
t
ion
asked
t
ha
t
ligh
t
ing
be
limi
t
ed
and
t
ha
t
no
f
iber
op
t
ic
or
neon
t
ype
ligh
t
ing
be
used
and
t
his
would
be
included
in
t
he
P
UD
.
Chairperson
Car
t
wrigh
t
indica
t
ed
t
ha
t
many
o
f t
hese
i
t
ems
would
be
addressed
wi
t
h
t
he
si
t
e
plan
.
Ronnie
W
illiams
t
hanked
t
he
applican
t f
or
a
good
job
approaching
changing
f
rom
o
ff
ice
t
o
re
t
ail
.
Commissioner
W
aner
was
concerned
t
ha
t t
here
was
t
oo
much
re
t
ail
being
reques
t
ed
wi
t
h
t
he
large
area
be
added
nor
t
h
o
f t
he
bank
.
Mo
t
ion
by
Moyer
,
seconded
by
Moore
, t
o
approve
t
his
reques
t.
M
o
t
i
on
carr
i
e
d
by
a
vo
t
e
o
f
4-1
as
f
ollows
:
AYES
:
Members
:
Moyer
,
Moore
,
T
hrash
and
Chairperson
Car
t
wrigh
t
N
AYS
:
W
aner
T
he
nex
t
i
t
em
on
t
he
agenda
was
Case
#
Z
060061
P
ub
li
c
Hear
i
ng
a
nd
C
on
s
i
d
erat
i
on
o
f
rez
on
i
ng
fr
o
m
“
D-1
”
Restr
i
cte
d
C
o
mmerc
i
a
l
a
nd
“
D-
O
”
S
ubu
r
b
a
n
O
ff
i
ce
P
l
a
nn
e
d
U
n
i
t
Deve
l
op
me
n
t
t
o
“
D-1
”
Restr
i
cte
d
C
o
mmerc
i
a
l
P
l
a
nn
e
d
U
n
i
t
Deve
l
op
me
n
t
Usa
g
e
no
rt
h
o
f
W
est
E
d
m
ond
R
o
a
d
,
½
m
il
e
w
est
o
f
Ke
ll
y
.
(D
oo
l
ey
F
arms
,
LL
C)
B
rian
Coon
represen
t
ing
Dooley
F
arms
,
LLC
,
is
reques
t
ing
approval
o
f
re
t
ail
uses
wes
t
o
f
A
rves
t
B
ank
on
t
he
nor
t
h
side
o
f
W
es
t
E
dmond
Road
and
along
Dooley
F
arms
Lane
nor
t
h
o
f
A
rves
t
B
ank
.
T
his
proper
t
y
con
t
ains
14
.
34
acres
.
T
he
f
ollowing
uses
will
no
t
be
permi
tt
ed
on
t
he
lo
t
s
t
ha
t
abu
t
E
dmond
Road
:
1
.
Help
yoursel
f
laundry
2
.
F
ranchise
Res
t
auran
t
s
t
ha
t
would
require
speci
f
ic
archi
t
ec
t
ural
s
t
yles
t
ha
t
would
no
t
ma
t
ch
buildings
as
speci
f
ied
in
t
he
P
UD
applica
t
ion
.
3
.
Car
wash
4
.
Convenience
s
t
ore
5
.
F
uel
service
s
t
a
t
ion
6
.
I
ndoor
t
hea
t
ers
7
.
G
rocery
s
t
ore
,
S
upermarke
t
8
.
A
ny
business
t
ha
t
includes
a
drive-in
window
9
.
A
ppliance
s
t
ore
10
.
Newspaper
and
magazine
sales
11
.
Radio
and
t
elevision
sales
and
service
12
.
Res
t
auran
t
s
shall
have
t
he
f
ollowing
exclusions
:
no
drive-in
window
,
no
pickup
service
,
no
ex
t
erior
menu
board
T
he
f
ollowing
use
will
no
t
be
loca
t
ed
wi
t
hin
t
his
P
UD
:
drive-in
res
t
auran
t
such
as
S
onic
or
Johnnie
’
s
.
T
he
Mas
t
er
Developmen
t
P
lan
se
t
s
ou
t
si
t
es
f
or
10
buildings
accessed
o
ff
W
es
t
E
dmond
Road
or
Dooley
F
arms
Lane
.
A
ll
t
he
buildings
are
in
t
erconnec
t
ed
wi
t
h
driveways
.
S
t
eve
’
s
P
lanning
Commission
196
A
ugus
t
22
,
2006
Rib
is
loca
t
ed
immedia
t
ely
wes
t
o
f t
his
si
t
e
and
would
also
connec
t
wi
t
h
t
he
driveway
sys
t
em
.
S
t
eve
’
s
Rib
serves
as
a
possible
example
o
f
archi
t
ec
t
ural
quali
t
y
f
or
t
he
addi
t
ional
re
t
ail
buildings
planned
.
S
t
eve
’
s
Rib
has
no
ground
sign
even
t
hough
W
es
t
E
dmond
Road
allows
a
20
f
oo
t t
all
ground
sign
and
75
square
f
ee
t.
T
he
landscaping
has
been
well
main
t
ained
.
Ma
t
erials
on
t
he
building
are
a
combina
t
ion
o
f
s
t
one
and
high
quali
t
y
s
t
ucco
ma
t
erials
cons
t
ruc
t
ed
in
neu
t
ral
colors
t
ha
t
are
compa
t
ible
wi
t
h
t
he
nearby
residen
t
ial
and
do
no
t
a
no
t
iceable
change
t
o
t
he
surroundings
.
A
ccess
managemen
t
is
comple
t
ed
t
o
t
he
highes
t
s
t
andard
wi
t
h
separa
t
ion
o
f
and
loca
t
ion
o
f
driveways
.
T
he
heigh
t
o
f t
he
building
and
scale
work
wi
t
h
t
he
building
se
t
backs
f
rom
t
he
edges
o
f t
he
proper
t
y
.
T
he
proposed
developmen
t
provides
f
or
t
he
narrow
dimension
o
f t
he
building
t
o
f
ace
E
dmond
Road
so
t
ha
t t
here
will
no
t
be
a
s
t
rip
cen
t
er
f
acing
t
he
s
t
ree
t.
T
here
are
minimal
se
t
backs
on
t
he
buildings
bu
t t
his
will
provide
f
or
a
small
landscape
area
along
E
dmond
Road
and
works
wi
t
h
t
he
driveway
spacing
planned
.
T
here
will
only
be
2
addi
t
ional
drives
beyond
t
he
exi
t f
rom
A
rves
t
B
ank
and
t
he
en
t
rance
in
t
o
S
t
eve
’
s
Rib
.
T
he
commercial
buildings
neares
t
K
imberly
Crossing
are
on
t
he
eas
t
side
o
f t
he
lo
t
away
f
rom
t
he
creek
and
t
he
eas
t
side
o
f t
he
residen
t
ial
area
.
T
his
projec
t
will
likely
be
a
mixed
use
projec
t
o
f
ligh
t
re
t
ail
and
o
ff
ice
.
Mo
t
ion
by
Moore
,
seconded
by
T
hrash
, t
o
approve
t
his
reques
t.
M
o
t
i
on
carr
i
e
d
by
a
vo
t
e
o
f
4-1
as
f
ollows
:
AYES
:
Members
:
Moore
,
T
hrash
,
Moyer
and
Chairperson
Car
t
wrigh
t
N
AYS
:
W
aner
T
he
nex
t
i
t
em
on
t
he
agenda
was
Case
#
P
R060024
C
on
s
i
d
erat
i
on
o
f
F
i
n
a
l
P
l
at
f
o
r
W
ater
’
s
E
dg
e
at
C
o
ve
ll
V
ill
a
g
e
l
o
cate
d
no
rt
h
east
o
f
C
o
ve
ll
V
ill
a
g
e
P
ark
w
ay
w
est
o
f
Ke
ll
y
s
ou
t
h
o
f
C
o
ve
ll.
(Derek
Tu
r
n
er)
Derek
T
urner
is
reques
t
ing
approval
on
a
11
.
6
acre
mul
t
i-
f
amily
parcel
t
ha
t
is
in
t
he
cen
t
er
o
f t
he
Covell
V
illage
projec
t.
T
he
proper
t
y
is
zoned
“
C-3
”
so
180
uni
t
s
could
be
buil
t
on
t
his
proper
t
y
.
T
he
P
UD
Design
S
t
a
t
emen
t
iden
t
i
f
ied
f
ewer
mul
t
i-
f
amily
uni
t
s
.
T
here
is
a
large
de
t
en
t
ion
pond
on
t
his
proper
t
y
.
T
hree
single
f
amily
addi
t
ions
are
under
cons
t
ruc
t
ion
t
o
t
he
wes
t, t
he
sou
t
h
and
t
he
sou
t
heas
t.
W
hen
t
hose
addi
t
ions
are
f
inished
ci
t
y
wa
t
er
and
sewer
will
be
adjacen
t t
o
t
he
proper
t
y
as
well
as
t
he
comple
t
ion
o
f
Covell
V
illage
Drive
.
T
he
addi
t
ion
consis
t
s
o
f
one
lo
t
mos
t
o
f
which
is
common
area
f
or
ei
t
her
t
he
pool
and
t
he
communi
t
y
building
or
t
he
de
t
en
t
ion
area
.
T
he
f
ron
t
se
t
back
along
Covell
V
illage
Drive
is
25
f
ee
t.
T
he
land
t
o
t
he
nor
t
h
and
eas
t
is
zoned
commercial
.
K
ei
t
h
B
ea
tt
y
wi
t
h
I
sch
and
A
ssocia
t
es
represen
t
ing
t
he
applican
t
indica
t
ed
t
ha
t
when
t
he
projec
t
is
ready
, t
hey
do
no
t
plan
more
t
han
150
uni
t
s
.
P
lanning
Commission
197
A
ugus
t
22
,
2006
Mo
t
ion
by
W
aner
,
seconded
by
Moore
, t
o
approve
t
his
reques
t.
M
o
t
i
on
carr
i
e
d
by
a
vo
t
e
o
f
5-0
as
f
ollows
:
AYES
:
Members
:
W
aner
,
Moore
,
T
hrash
,
Moyer
and
Chairperson
Car
t
wrigh
t
N
AYS
:
None
T
he
nex
t
i
t
em
on
t
he
agenda
was
Case
#U060008
P
ub
li
c
Hear
i
ng
a
nd
C
on
s
i
d
erat
i
on
o
f
S
p
ec
i
a
l
Use
P
erm
i
t
t
o
i
n
c
l
ud
e
f
o
r
a
c
on
ve
n
i
e
n
ce
st
o
re
,
car
w
as
h
,
g
as
o
li
n
e
sa
l
es
a
nd
c
o
mmerc
i
a
l
s
i
te
p
l
a
n
a
pp
r
o
va
l
f
o
r
on
e
bu
il
d
i
ng
i
n
“
D-1
”
Restr
i
cte
d
C
o
mmerc
i
a
l
D
i
str
i
ct
on
t
h
e
no
rt
h
east
c
o
r
n
er
o
f
A
i
r
De
po
t
a
nd
C
o
ve
ll.
(Mark
A
b
e
l
)
Commissioner
Moore
le
ft t
he
room
f
or
t
he
discussion
and
vo
t
e
o
f t
his
i
t
em
.
T
he
proper
t
y
on
t
he
nor
t
heas
t
corner
o
f
Covell
and
A
ir
Depo
t
is
zoned
“
D-1
”
Res
t
ric
t
ed
Commercial
.
T
he
land
t
o
t
he
wes
t
is
zoned
“
D-1
”
Res
t
ric
t
ed
Commercial
bu
t
is
par
t
o
f
a
larger
t
rac
t
wi
t
h
“
E
-1
”
uses
f
or
t
he
160
acres
wes
t
o
f
A
ir
Depo
t
nor
t
h
o
f
Covell
ex
t
ending
wes
t t
o
I
-35
.
T
he
sou
t
hwes
t
corner
o
f t
he
in
t
ersec
t
ion
con
t
ains
t
he
F
ire
T
raining
Cen
t
er
on
land
zoned
“
F
-1
”
Ligh
t I
ndus
t
rial
P
UD
.
A
small
t
rac
t
o
f
land
on
t
he
sou
t
heas
t
corner
is
s
t
ill
zoned
residen
t
ial
bu
t
is
projec
t
ed
f
or
higher
uses
on
t
he
proposed
E
dmond
P
lan
I
V
.
G
eneral
S
i
t
e
Cri
t
eria
:
E
xis
t
ing
zoning
–
“
D-1
”
Res
t
ric
t
ed
Commercial
,
S
pecial
Use
P
ermi
t
required
f
or
convenience
s
t
ore
,
car
wash
and
gasoline
sales
.
S
e
t
backs
–
se
t
back
f
rom
t
he
cen
t
er
line
o
f
Covell
is
212
f
ee
t
and
f
rom
t
he
cen
t
er
line
o
f
A
ir
Depo
t
is
140
f
ee
t;
70
f
oo
t
o
f
righ
t
-o
f
-way
is
needed
on
bo
t
h
o
f t
hese
s
t
ree
t
s
and
t
he
se
t
backs
will
s
t
ill
be
me
t
even
wi
t
h
t
he
righ
t
-o
f
-way
provided
a
t t
he
t
ime
o
f t
he
pla
t;
parking
will
need
t
o
be
modi
f
ied
along
A
ir
Depo
t
or
considered
t
emporary
i
f t
he
f
ull
righ
t
-o
f
-way
is
used
f
or
s
t
ree
t
improvemen
t
s
t
o
include
u
t
ili
t
y
line
reloca
t
ion
.
Heigh
t
o
f
buildings
–
23
f
ee
t,
3960
square
f
ee
t
in
area
Parking
–
38 parking spaces are provided not including the 13 spaces that could be
affected by the right-of-way along Air Depot, this would be parking for the entire
project if another building is added in the future
Lot size
–
71,572 square feet (1.64 acres)
1
.
Landscape
P
lan
Landscaping
-
Lo
t
area
=
71
,
572
s
f
Landscape
provided
on
plans
submi
tt
ed
T
en
per
cen
t
o
f
lo
t
=
7
,
157
s
f
7157
s
f
landscaping
/
lawn
area
P
lan
t
uni
t
s
required
=
573
plan
t
uni
t
s
583
plan
t
uni
t
s
Required
in
f
ron
t
yard
=
3579
t
o
t
al
s
f
3579
s
f
in
f
ron
t
yard
F
ron
t
yard
plan
t
uni
t
s
=
287
plan
t
uni
t
s
287
plan
t
uni
t
s
E
vergreen
required
=
229
plan
t
uni
t
s
398
plan
t
uni
t
s
2
.
Ligh
t
ing
P
lan
–
t
he
owner
is
planning
t
o
have
no
ligh
t
poles
, t
here
would
be
ligh
t
ing
under
t
he
canopy
o
f t
he
pump
island
and
wall
packs
on
t
he
building
wi
t
h
shields
t
o
reduce
t
he
amoun
t
o
f
ambien
t
ligh
t
spreading
o
ff t
he
si
t
e
.
O
ne
pole
ligh
t
may
be
needed
A
ir
Depo
t
on
t
he
nor
t
h
side
o
f t
he
driveway
nex
t t
o
t
he
13
parking
spaces
P
lanning
Commission
198
A
ugus
t
22
,
2006
and
t
ha
t
is
all
t
ha
t
is
planned
a
t t
his
t
ime
.
3
.
Driveways
/
P
arking
–
a
t t
his
t
ime
,
one
driveway
is
planned
on
Covell
Road
and
t
wo
on
A
ir
Depo
t.
Due
t
o
t
he
in
t
ersec
t
ion
loca
t
ion
,
righ
t
-o
f
-way
is
needed
f
or
t
he
t
urning
movemen
t
s
f
or
t
he
long
t
erm
f
u
t
ure
even
i
f t
he
roads
were
f
our
laned
wi
t
hou
t
a
parkway
or
median
divider
.
4
.
Mechanical
equipmen
t
–
t
he
roo
f
cons
t
ruc
t
ion
is
f
la
t,
mechanical
equipmen
t
will
be
loca
t
ed
on
t
he
roo
f, t
he
parape
t
wall
will
screen
t
he
mechanical
equipmen
t.
5
.
F
encing
/
screening
–
a
6
f
oo
t t
all
sigh
t
proo
f f
ence
is
required
along
t
he
nor
t
h
proper
t
y
line
.
6
.
S
ignage
–
no
ground
signs
are
planned
,
only
wall
signs
.
T
he
building
signs
could
be
225
square
f
ee
t f
acing
Covell
,
115
f
acing
A
ir
Depo
t f
or
one
building
and
135
f
or
t
he
second
building
i
f
cons
t
ruc
t
ed
a
t
some
t
ime
in
t
he
f
u
t
ure
.
7
.
G
eneral
archi
t
ec
t
ural
appearance
–
t
he
building
is
planned
t
o
be
red
brick
veneer
and
spli
t f
ace
block
.
T
here
is
a
concre
t
e
panel
arch
a
t t
he
en
t
ryway
.
T
he
roo
f
is
f
la
t.
8
.
Drainage
Repor
t
and
rela
t
ed
G
rading
Repor
t
P
lans
–
drainage
plans
have
been
reviewed
by
E
ngineering
.
9
.
Re
f
use
f
acili
t
ies
–
t
he
dumps
t
ers
are
loca
t
ed
in
t
he
f
ar
nor
t
heas
t
corner
o
f t
he
proper
t
y
and
a
back-up
space
has
been
provided
f
or
t
he
t
rucks
t
o
maneuver
.
10
.
S
ensi
t
ive
borders
–
t
he
convenience
s
t
ore
is
loca
t
ed
123
f
ee
t f
rom
t
he
nor
t
h
proper
t
y
line
.
T
rees
are
planned
in
t
he
nor
t
h
30
f
ee
t
and
a
f
ence
would
be
ins
t
alled
as
needed
.
T
his
si
t
e
plan
does
no
t
cover
t
he
f
u
t
ure
re
t
ail
cen
t
er
shown
.
T
he
convenience
s
t
ore
exceeds
t
he
sensi
t
ive
border
s
t
andard
a
t t
his
t
ime
which
is
no
t
a
minimum
manda
t
ory
requiremen
t
a
t t
his
loca
t
ion
.
11
.
S
t
ree
t
paving
and
access
managemen
t
–
widening
is
sugges
t
ed
along
bo
t
h
Covell
and
A
ir
Depo
t t
o
f
acili
t
a
t
e
access
t
o
t
he
convenience
s
t
ore
which
genera
t
es
signi
f
ican
t t
rips
. It
will
be
some
t
ime
be
f
ore
A
ir
Depo
t
and
Covell
will
quali
f
y
f
or
s
t
ree
t
improvemen
t f
unding
.
12
.
T
i
t
le
21
W
a
t
er
and
S
ani
t
ary
S
ewer
P
lans
–
ci
t
y
wa
t
er
will
need
t
o
be
connec
t
ed
and
ex
t
ended
t
he
leng
t
h
o
f t
his
proper
t
y
f
or
t
his
par
t
icular
si
t
e
which
may
be
over
220
f
oo
t
including
t
he
connec
t
ion
t
o
A
ir
Dep
o
t.
S
ewer
may
need
t
o
be
ex
t
ended
t
o
t
he
smaller
lo
t
wi
t
h
t
he
appropria
t
e
easemen
t
s
.
T
he
archi
t
ec
t f
or
Mark
A
bel
indica
t
ed
t
ha
t t
here
would
be
a
f
ence
on
t
he
nor
t
h
proper
t
y
line
and
landscaping
near
t
he
nor
t
h
proper
t
y
line
neares
t t
he
homes
.
T
he
land
f
or
t
he
convenience
s
t
ore
was
also
a
t
a
lower
eleva
t
ion
t
han
t
he
back
yards
o
f t
he
homes
so
t
hey
would
no
t
be
able
t
o
see
t
he
en
t
ire
building
f
rom
t
heir
back
yards
,
only
t
he
t
op
o
f t
he
canopy
.
Commissioner
T
hrash
asked
i
f t
he
convenience
s
t
ore
could
add
a
pi
t
ch
roo
f t
o
be
more
residen
t
ial
in
charac
t
er
since
t
his
was
one
o
f t
he
f
irs
t
commercial
businesses
t
o
be
cons
t
ruc
t
ed
.
P
i
t
ch
roo
f
s
have
been
used
a
t t
he
Cross
T
imbers
Complex
.
T
he
archi
t
ec
t
indica
t
ed
he
would
have
t
o
discuss
t
ha
t
wi
t
h
t
he
owners
.
A
new
residen
t
a
t
5800
Hardwick
Lane
indica
t
ed
he
had
moved
in
one
week
ago
and
he
f
el
t t
he
gas
s
t
a
t
ion
was
a
po
t
en
t
ial
hazard
.
He
re
f
erred
t
o
a
loca
t
ion
he
had
been
in
in
F
lorida
where
t
he
gas
P
lanning
Commission
199
A
ugus
t
22
,
2006
pumps
blew
up
.
He
f
el
t t
he
projec
t
was
t
oo
close
t
o
t
he
residen
t
ial
.
Commissioner
W
aner
commen
t
ed
t
he
appearance
o
f t
he
s
t
ruc
t
ure
even
wi
t
h
t
he
brick
veneer
was
no
t
pre
f
erred
t
o
f
i
t
wi
t
hin
t
his
residen
t
ial
area
.
S
he
f
el
t t
he
projec
t
had
minimal
landscaping
f
or
t
he
loca
t
ion
and
t
ha
t
screening
near
t
he
homes
was
no
t
adequa
t
e
.
Commissioner
T
hrash
f
el
t t
he
projec
t
looked
like
mos
t
o
t
her
convenience
s
t
ores
;
in
t
his
case
i
t
was
no
t
designed
t
o
blend
wi
t
h
t
he
homes
.
T
he
canopy
was
jus
t t
he
s
t
andard
canopy
.
J
.
W
.
A
rms
t
rong
spoke
in
f
avor
o
f t
he
reques
t
indica
t
ing
t
he
pumps
and
t
anks
were
inspec
t
ed
by
t
he
F
ire
Depar
t
men
t
rou
t
inely
as
well
as
t
he
S
t
a
t
e
and
t
hey
were
well
over
300
f
ee
t f
rom
any
homes
a
t
a
much
lower
eleva
t
ion
.
Commissioner
W
aner
f
el
t t
his
was
no
t
a
quali
t
y
projec
t f
or
E
as
t
E
dmond
.
Mo
t
ion
by
Moyer
,
seconded
by
W
aner
, t
o
approve
t
his
reques
t.
M
o
t
i
on
d
e
n
i
e
d
by
a
vo
t
e
o
f
2-2
as
f
ollows
:
AYES
:
Members
:
Moyer
and
Chairperson
Car
t
wrigh
t
N
AYS
:
T
hrash
and
W
aner
(
Commissioner
Moore
le
ft t
he
room
f
or
t
he
discussion
and
vo
t
e
o
f t
his
i
t
em
.
)
T
he
nex
t
i
t
em
on
t
he
agenda
was
Case
#
Z
060060
P
ub
li
c
Hear
i
ng
a
nd
C
on
s
i
d
erat
i
on
o
f
re
qu
est
f
o
r
“
D-1
”
P
UD
P
l
a
n
Ame
nd
me
n
t
f
o
r
t
h
e
Da
n
f
o
rt
h
P
l
aza
p
r
o
j
ect
l
o
cate
d
s
ou
t
h
o
f
Da
n
f
o
rt
h
w
est
o
f
P
ark
L
a
n
e
A
dd
i
t
i
on
,
east
o
f
t
h
e
W
a
l
-Mart
S
up
erce
n
ter
on
t
h
e
s
ou
t
h
east
c
o
r
n
er
o
f
Da
n
f
o
rt
h
a
nd
S
a
n
ta
F
e
.
(
P
atsy
R
ub
l
e)
P
a
t
sy
Ruble
represen
t
ing
t
he
proper
t
y
owner
is
reques
t
ing
an
amendmen
t t
o
t
he
P
UD
t
o
allow
a
liquor
s
t
ore
as
one
o
f t
he
S
pecial
P
ermi
t
uses
t
ha
t
could
be
reques
t
ed
a
t t
his
shopping
cen
t
er
.
T
here
was
a
lis
t
o
f
8
uses
t
ha
t
were
disallowed
wi
t
h
t
he
original
P
UD
submi
tt
ed
by
E
xpressway
Developmen
t
A
ssocia
t
es
.
T
his
is
no
t
a
S
pecial
Use
P
ermi
t
reques
t
bu
t
an
amendmen
t t
o
t
he
P
UD
Design
S
t
a
t
emen
t.
Changing
t
he
Design
S
t
a
t
emen
t
would
be
a
policy
ma
tt
er
f
or
t
he
P
lanning
Commission
and
Ci
t
y
Council
.
A
ll
o
f
t
he
uses
f
ace
wes
t t
oward
W
al-Mar
t
backing
up
t
o
homes
in
t
he
P
ark
Lane
A
ddi
t
ion
.
T
here
are
doors
on
t
he
back
o
f t
he
building
bu
t
since
t
here
is
such
a
narrow
f
ire
lane
,
t
here
is
no
room
t
o
load
much
f
rom
t
he
back
driveway
wi
t
hou
t
blocking
t
he
f
ire
lane
.
A
copy
o
f t
he
original
P
UD
Design
S
t
a
t
emen
t
is
a
tt
ached
.
P
a
t
sy
Ruble
indica
t
ed
t
he
shopping
cen
t
er
was
approxima
t
ely
45%
vacan
t.
S
he
f
el
t t
he
liquor
s
t
ore
was
a
very
con
t
rolled
business
and
would
be
compa
t
ible
wi
t
h
t
he
surrounding
area
.
A
residen
t
a
t
1205
B
lue
Ridge
spoke
in
opposi
t
ion
indica
t
ing
t
ha
t t
he
original
developer
agreed
no
t t
o
have
a
liquor
s
t
ore
or
t
o
upgrade
t
he
uses
.
He
indica
t
ed
t
here
were
o
t
her
liquor
s
t
ores
wi
t
hin
one
mile
.
He
indica
t
ed
t
he
t
rees
had
no
t
been
main
t
ained
in
t
he
back
o
f t
he
cen
t
er
.
G
ary
S
t
illman
1208
E
arl
A
Rodkey
Drive
,
presiden
t
o
f t
he
P
ark
Lane
E
s
t
a
t
es
Homeowners
A
ssocia
t
ion
,
spoke
in
opposi
t
ion
.
E
d
Moore
spoke
in
opposi
t
ion
re
f
erencing
t
he
agreemen
t
reached
wi
t
h
F
rank
B
a
tt
le
wi
t
h
t
he
original
P
lanning
Commission
200
A
ugus
t
22
,
2006
zoning
,
indica
t
ed
i
t
was
no
t
appropria
t
e
t
o
change
t
he
unders
t
anding
t
ha
t
all
t
he
residen
t
s
had
.
Ronnie
W
illiams
wi
t
h
E
N
A
spoke
in
opposi
t
ion
.
He
indica
t
ed
t
his
was
a
big
issue
because
t
he
condi
t
ions
o
f t
he
agreemen
t
allowed
t
he
upgrade
f
rom
“
D-
O
”
t
o
“
D
-1
”
.
Chairperson
Car
t
wrigh
t
indica
t
ed
t
his
was
speci
f
ically
excluded
as
a
use
and
including
t
he
requiremen
t t
ha
t t
he
Design
S
t
a
t
emen
t
could
no
t
be
upgraded
.
Mo
t
ion
by
Moore
,
seconded
by
T
hrash
, t
o
approve
t
his
reques
t.
M
o
t
i
on
d
e
n
i
e
d
by
a
vo
t
e
o
f
0-5
as
f
ollows
:
AYES
:
None
N
AYS
:
Members
:
Moore
,
T
hrash
,
W
aner
,
Moyer
and
Chairperson
Car
t
wrigh
t
T
he
nex
t
i
t
em
on
t
he
agenda
was
Case
#
P
R060020
P
ub
li
c
Hear
i
ng
a
nd
C
on
s
i
d
erat
i
on
o
f
P
re
li
m
i
n
ary
P
l
at
f
o
r
t
h
e
Nay
l
o
r
A
dd
i
t
i
on
on
t
h
e
w
est
s
i
d
e
o
f
Br
o
a
d
w
ay
,
w
est
o
f
A
pp
l
e
b
ee
’
s
Resta
u
ra
n
t
.
(D
o
ll
ar
Deve
l
op
ers
,
LL
C
)
A
preliminary
pla
t
has
been
submi
tt
ed
f
or
t
he
Candlewood
S
ui
t
es
projec
t
indica
t
ing
t
he
proposed
building
and
a
po
t
en
t
ial
f
u
t
ure
building
t
o
t
he
sou
t
h
.
T
he
parking
lo
t
s
in
t
erconnec
t
be
t
ween
t
he
t
wo
lo
t
s
.
A
f
ire
lane
is
provided
around
t
he
perime
t
er
,
nor
t
h
sou
t
h
,
eas
t
and
wes
t
o
f t
he
t
wo
lo
t
s
.
A
ll
signs
will
be
placed
on
t
he
individual
lo
t
s
even
t
hough
t
hese
proper
t
ies
over
237
f
ee
t
wes
t
o
f
B
roadway
.
Railroad
t
racks
are
loca
t
ed
immedia
t
ely
t
o
t
he
wes
t.
Marke
t
S
quare
is
loca
t
ed
t
o
t
he
nor
t
h
and
t
he
Ci
t
y
B
i
t
es
res
t
auran
t
is
loca
t
ed
t
o
t
he
sou
t
h
.
W
a
t
er
,
sewer
and
drainage
plans
have
been
submi
tt
ed
.
Mo
t
ion
by
W
aner
,
seconded
by
Moore
, t
o
approve
t
his
reques
t.
M
o
t
i
on
carr
i
e
d
by
a
vo
t
e
o
f
5-0
as
f
ollows
:
AYES
:
Members
:
W
aner
,
Moore
,
T
hrash
,
Moyer
and
Chairperson
Car
t
wrigh
t
N
AYS
:
None
T
he
nex
t
i
t
em
on
t
he
agenda
was
Case
#
P
R060020
C
on
s
i
d
erat
i
on
o
f
F
i
n
a
l
P
l
at
f
o
r
t
h
e
Nay
l
o
r
A
dd
i
t
i
on
on
t
h
e
w
est
s
i
d
e
o
f
Br
o
a
d
w
ay
,
w
est
o
f
A
pp
l
e
b
ee
’
s
Resta
u
ra
n
t
.
(D
o
ll
ar
Deve
l
op
ers
,
LL
C)
T
his
pla
t
covers
t
he
area
proposed
f
or
t
he
Candlewood
S
ui
t
es
Ho
t
el
.
T
he
Candlewood
S
ui
t
es
would
be
cons
t
ruc
t
ed
on
B
lock
1
,
Lo
t
1
(1
.
86
acres)
.
Lo
t
2
loca
t
ed
t
o
t
he
sou
t
h
(0
.
96
acres)
would
be
a
separa
t
e
use
.
T
here
is
a
u
t
ili
t
y
and
access
easemen
t
separa
t
ing
t
he
t
wo
lo
t
s
.
T
he
proper
t
y
t
o
t
he
eas
t
is
developed
as
t
he
A
pplebee
’
s
Res
t
auran
t
and
t
here
is
a
separa
t
e
lo
t
also
t
o
t
he
eas
t f
or
t
he
Harley
Davidson
’
s
shop
.
T
he
building
on
t
he
proper
t
y
will
be
demolished
t
o
make
way
f
or
t
he
ho
t
el
.
T
he
his
t
orical
access
t
o
t
his
proper
t
y
has
been
f
rom
B
roadway
and
t
ha
t
ingress
and
egress
easemen
t
is
shown
on
t
he
pla
t.
A
u
t
ili
t
y
easemen
t
surrounds
t
he
lo
t
s
as
shown
on
t
he
pla
t.
P
lanning
Commission
201
A
ugus
t
22
,
2006
Mo
t
ion
by
Moyer
,
seconded
by
Moore
, t
o
approve
t
his
reques
t.
M
o
t
i
on
carr
i
e
d
by
a
vo
t
e
o
f
5-0
as
f
ollows
:
AYES
:
Members
:
Moyer
,
Moore
,
W
aner
,
T
hrash
and
Chairperson
Car
t
wrigh
t
N
AYS
:
None
T
he
nex
t
i
t
em
on
t
he
agenda
was
Case
#
P
R060021
C
on
s
i
d
erat
i
on
o
f
F
i
n
a
l
P
l
at
o
f
t
h
e
MHA
B
u
s
i
n
ess
P
ark
l
o
cate
d
s
ou
t
h
o
f
Ke
ll
y
P
o
i
n
te
Dr
i
ve
no
rt
h
o
f
33
r
d
S
treet
.
Mark
F
arris
wi
t
h
Red
P
lains
E
ngineering
is
reques
t
ing
F
inal
P
la
t
approval
o
f t
he
MH
A
B
usiness
P
ark
where
t
he
Maschino
o
ff
ice
building
was
recen
t
ly
approved
.
T
his
proper
t
y
is
loca
t
ed
eas
t
o
f t
he
original
K
elley
P
oin
t
e
t
wo
s
t
ory
o
ff
ice
building
where
t
he
MR
I f
acili
t
y
is
loca
t
ed
.
T
his
subdivision
will
con
t
ain
3
lo
t
s
,
2
o
f
which
require
a
common
access
easemen
t
because
t
hey
are
no
t
adjacen
t t
o
a
public
s
t
ree
t.
T
he
drive
way
t
o
t
he
t
wo
s
t
ory
o
ff
ice
building
is
loca
t
ed
immedia
t
ely
wes
t
and
was
t
he
approved
access
f
or
t
he
Maschino
building
.
A
ll
o
f t
he
land
is
zoned
indus
t
rial
around
t
his
proper
t
y
so
t
he
side
yard
se
t
backs
are
minimal
based
on
t
he
zoning
code
, t
he
building
code
will
mos
t
likely
require
a
10
f
oo
t
side
yard
se
t
back
.
T
he
se
t
back
on
K
elley
P
oin
t
e
Drive
is
25
f
ee
t
and
t
ha
t
se
t
back
line
needs
t
o
be
shown
on
t
he
pla
t
as
well
as
t
he
in
t
erconnec
t
ing
driveway
easemen
t
unless
t
here
is
a
common
easemen
t
already
in
place
wes
t
o
f t
his
proper
t
y
on
t
he
K
ay
B
ee
I
nves
t
men
t
land
and
t
ha
t
easemen
t
is
recorded
guaran
t
eeing
lo
t
s
1
and
2
access
.
P
ublic
wa
t
er
and
sewer
are
also
needed
f
or
each
lo
t
and
possibly
f
ire
hydran
t
s
which
need
t
o
be
placed
in
public
u
t
ili
t
y
easemen
t
s
.
W
i
t
h
t
he
condi
t
ions
men
t
ioned
in
t
his
memorandum
, t
his
pla
t
is
ready
f
or
approval
.
Mo
t
ion
by
W
aner
,
seconded
by
Moore
, t
o
approve
t
his
reques
t.
M
o
t
i
on
carr
i
e
d
by
a
vo
t
e
o
f
5-0
as
f
ollows
:
AYES
:
Members
:
W
aner
,
Moore
,
Moyer
,
T
hrash
and
Chairperson
Car
t
wrigh
t
N
AYS
:
None
T
he
nex
t
i
t
em
on
t
he
agenda
was
Case
#
P
R060022
P
ub
li
c
Hear
i
ng
a
nd
C
on
s
i
d
erat
i
on
o
f
P
re
li
m
i
n
ary
P
l
at
f
o
r
P
eav
i
n
e
R
i
dg
e
A
dd
i
t
i
on
w
est
o
f
N
o
rt
h
D
oug
l
as
B
ou
l
evar
d
,
on
e-
h
a
l
f
m
il
e
no
rt
h
o
f
S
o
r
ghu
m
M
ill
R
o
a
d
.
(
P
a
u
l
a
nd
Cy
n
t
h
i
a
W
a
i
ts)
S
a
t
ish
Dashara
t
hy
wi
t
h
E
agle
Consul
t
an
t
s
is
reques
t
ing
approval
on
behal
f
o
f t
he
proper
t
y
owners
P
aul
and
Cyn
t
hia
W
ai
t
s
f
or
an
16
.
96
acre
P
reliminary
P
la
t
o
f
P
eavine
Ridge
,
wes
t
o
f
Douglas
,
nor
t
h
o
f
S
orghum
Mill
Road
.
T
he
addi
t
ion
con
t
ains
7
lo
t
s
and
has
been
recen
t
ly
zoned
“
R-1
”
Rural
E
s
t
a
t
e
Dwelling
.
T
he
lo
t
sizes
f
or
t
his
addi
t
ion
,
including
t
he
priva
t
e
s
t
ree
t,
are
a
t
leas
t
90
,
000
square
f
ee
t,
which
is
t
he
minimum
lo
t
size
in
“
R-1
”
.
W
hile
Lo
t
7
appears
t
o
be
under
t
he
90
,
000
square
f
oo
t
size
limi
t, t
he
adjacen
t
common
area
can
be
coun
t
ed
in
calcula
t
ing
t
he
lo
t
size
.
T
his
addi
t
ion
will
be
developed
wi
t
h
wa
t
er
wells
and
sep
t
ic
t
anks
.
Curren
t
ly
, t
he
proper
t
y
is
vacan
t
wi
t
h
a
small
pond
P
lanning
Commission
202
A
ugus
t
22
,
2006
near
t
he
wes
t
ern
side
o
f t
he
proper
t
y
.
T
he
roads
are
iden
t
i
f
ied
as
being
priva
t
e
f
or
t
his
addi
t
ion
.
T
here
is
a
f
lood
plain
a
t t
he
wes
t
ern
side
o
f t
his
addi
t
ion
and
t
ha
t
is
iden
t
i
f
ied
as
Common
A
rea
“
A
”
.
T
here
is
also
a
priva
t
e
drainage
easemen
t
be
t
ween
Lo
t
s
1
and
Lo
t
s
2
.
T
here
are
“
Limi
t
s
o
f
No
A
ccess
”
along
Douglas
Road
.
T
here
are
also
limi
t
a
t
ions
f
or
driveways
f
or
Lo
t
s
1
and
2
due
t
o
t
he
separa
t
ion
needed
be
t
ween
t
he
drives
and
t
he
priva
t
e
drainage
easemen
t.
T
he
proper
t
y
t
o
t
he
sou
t
h
con
t
ains
a
new
single
f
amily
residence
.
T
he
proper
t
y
eas
t
and
wes
t
is
un
-
pla
tt
ed
and
undeveloped
,
and
zoned
“
G
-
A
”
G
eneral
A
gricul
t
ural
Dis
t
ric
t.
T
he
land
t
o
t
he
nor
t
h
is
ou
t
side
E
dmond
’
s
ci
t
y
limi
t
s
,
an
unincorpora
t
ed
area
o
f
O
klahoma
Coun
t
y
.
Mo
t
ion
by
T
hrash
,
seconded
by
Moore
, t
o
approve
t
his
reques
t.
M
o
t
i
on
carr
i
e
d
by
a
vo
t
e
o
f
5-0
as
f
ollows
:
AYES
:
Members
:
T
hrash
,
Moore
,
Moyer
,
W
aner
and
Chairperson
Car
t
wrigh
t
N
AYS
:
None
T
he
nex
t
i
t
em
on
t
he
agenda
was
C
on
s
i
d
erat
i
on
o
f
re
qu
est
b
y
Rya
n
L
i
tz
f
o
r
d
ee
d
cert
i
f
i
cat
i
on
d
i
v
i
d
i
ng
a
5
.
06
acre
tract
i
n
t
o
t
w
o
p
arce
l
s
,
on
e
3
acres
a
nd
on
e
2
.
06
acres
at
2516
B
ob
w
h
i
te
T
ra
il
(
un
rec
o
r
d
e
d
p
l
at
o
f
“
Deer
Creek
E
states
II
”
)
.
Ryan
Li
t
z
is
reques
t
ing
t
ha
t
one
5
.
06
acre
t
rac
t
be
divided
in
t
o
t
wo
residen
t
ial
lo
t
s
one
3
acres
and
one
2
.
06
acres
.
T
his
area
is
zoned
“
A
”
S
ingle
F
amily
and
is
some
t
imes
re
f
erred
t
o
“
Deer
Creek
E
s
t
a
t
es
II
”
bu
t
i
t
is
ac
t
ually
un-pla
tt
ed
.
T
he
descrip
t
ions
are
me
t
es
and
bounds
as
shown
on
t
he
legal
descrip
t
ions
and
as
shown
by
t
he
O
klahoma
Coun
t
y
A
ssessor
.
A
number
o
f
lo
t
s
have
been
divided
in
t
o
2
acre
t
rac
t
s
in
t
his
developmen
t
sou
t
h
o
f
S
orghum
Mill
Road
,
wes
t
o
f
S
an
t
a
F
e
.
T
here
is
a
house
on
t
he
3
acre
t
rac
t.
T
his
area
will
be
served
wi
t
h
individual
well
and
sep
t
ic
t
anks
and
/
or
aerobic
sys
t
ems
.
Driveways
will
be
cons
t
ruc
t
ed
on
B
obwhi
t
e
T
rail
.
T
here
are
lo
t
s
t
o
t
he
eas
t
o
f
t
his
proper
t
y
t
ha
t f
ron
t
on
S
an
t
a
F
e
also
par
t
o
f t
he
“
Deer
Creek
E
s
t
a
t
es
II
”
.
T
he
lo
t
s
are
no
t
loca
t
ed
wi
t
hin
a
f
loodplain
.
E
ach
lo
t
mee
t
s
t
he
minimum
lo
t
size
f
or
an
individual
well
and
sep
t
ic
t
ank
.
T
here
is
no
ci
t
y
wa
t
er
near
t
his
proper
t
y
.
S
t
a
ff
recommends
approval
.
Mo
t
ion
by
Moyer
,
seconded
by
W
aner
, t
o
approve
t
his
reques
t.
M
o
t
i
on
carr
i
e
d
by
a
vo
t
e
o
f
5-0
as
f
ollows
:
AYES
:
Members
:
Moyer
,
W
aner
,
T
hrash
,
Moore
and
Chairperson
Car
t
wrigh
t
N
AYS
:
None
T
he
nex
t
i
t
em
on
t
he
agenda
was
Case
#
P
R060023
C
on
s
i
d
erat
i
on
o
f
F
i
n
a
l
P
l
at
o
f
t
h
e
S
hop
s
at
t
h
e
P
i
azza
l
o
cate
d
on
t
h
e
east
s
i
d
e
o
f
Ke
ll
y
no
rt
h
o
f
t
h
e
N
o
rt
ho
aks
S
hopp
i
ng
Ce
n
ter
.
(M
i
c
h
ae
l
Fo
rt
h
)
P
lanning
Commission
203
A
ugus
t
22
,
2006
Coon
E
ngineer
ing
is
reques
t
ing
approval
o
f
a
10
.
7
acre
t
rac
t f
or
t
he
commercial
developmen
t
o
f
3
lo
t
s
and
a
common
area
nex
t t
o
t
he
W
es
t
borough
A
ddi
t
ion
nor
t
h
o
f t
he
Nor
t
hoaks
S
hopping
Cen
t
er
.
Lo
t
1
is
proposed
t
o
be
a
bank
and
will
be
developed
in
t
he
f
u
t
ure
.
Lo
t
2
is
a
shopping
cen
t
er
f
acing
K
elly
and
Lo
t
3
is
primarily
a
sel
f
s
t
orage
f
acili
t
y
wi
t
h
some
re
t
ail
shops
and
t
he
residen
t
ial
o
ff
ice
on
t
he
f
ron
t.
70
f
oo
t
o
f
righ
t
-o
f
-way
has
been
shown
on
K
elly
in
f
ron
t
o
f t
his
proper
t
y
.
T
he
land
is
zoned
as
a
P
UD
and
se
t
backs
along
K
elly
can
be
modi
f
ied
as
a
par
t
o
f t
he
P
UD
.
T
he
Common
A
rea
A
will
be
recons
t
ruc
t
ed
as
a
de
t
en
t
ion
area
.
U
t
ili
t
ies
will
be
ex
t
ended
on
t
o
t
he
sel
f
s
t
orage
Lo
t
3
f
or
f
ire
hydran
t
s
and
wa
t
er
line
loops
.
T
he
pla
t
provides
f
or
u
t
ili
t
y
easemen
t
s
as
needed
.
Mo
t
ion
by
Moyer
,
seconded
by
Moore
, t
o
approve
t
his
reques
t.
M
o
t
i
on
carr
i
e
d
by
a
vo
t
e
o
f
5-0
as
f
ollows
:
AYES
:
Members
:
Moyer
,
Moore
,
W
aner
,
T
hrash
and
Chairperson
Car
t
wrigh
t
N
AYS
:
None
T
he
nex
t
t
wo
i
t
em
s
on
t
he
agenda
were
Case
#
Z
060064
P
ub
li
c
Hear
i
ng
a
nd
C
on
s
i
d
erat
i
on
o
f
ame
nd
me
n
t
t
o
E
d
m
ond
P
l
a
n
III
fr
o
m
O
ff
i
ce
C
o
mmerc
i
a
l
P
l
a
nn
e
d
U
n
i
t
Deve
l
op
me
n
t
t
o
S
i
ng
l
e
F
am
il
y
D
w
e
lli
ng
Usa
g
e
on
t
h
e
s
ou
t
h
w
est
c
o
r
n
er
o
f
W
ay
n
e
a
nd
Jacks
on
,
525
N
.
Jacks
on
.
(R
onn
i
e
T
ay
l
o
r)
and
Case
#
Z
060065
P
ub
li
c
Hear
i
ng
a
nd
C
on
s
i
d
erat
i
on
o
f
rez
on
i
ng
fr
o
m
“
D-3
”
O
ff
i
ce
C
o
mmerc
i
a
l
P
l
a
nn
e
d
U
n
i
t
Deve
l
op
me
n
t
t
o
“
A
”
S
i
ng
l
e
F
am
il
y
D
w
e
lli
ng
D
i
str
i
ct
on
t
h
e
s
ou
t
h
w
est
c
o
r
n
er
o
f
W
ay
n
e
a
nd
Jacks
on
,
525
N
.
Jacks
on
.
(R
onn
i
e
T
ay
l
o
r)
T
hese
t
wo
i
t
ems
were
wi
t
hdrawn
by
applican
t
Ronnie
T
aylor
.
T
here
was
no
New
B
usiness
.
Mo
t
ion
by
Moyer
,
seconded
by
W
aner
, t
o
adjourn
.
M
o
t
i
on
carr
i
e
d
by
a
vo
t
e
o
f
5-0
as
f
ollows
:
AYES
:
Members
:
Moyer
,
W
aner
,
T
hrash
,
Moore
and
Chairperson
Car
t
wrigh
t
N
AYS
:
None
Mee
t
ing
adjourned
a
t
8
:
23
p
.
m
.
Leroy
Car
t
wrigh
t,
Chairperson
Rober
t
S
chiermeyer
,
S
ecre
t
ary
E
dmond
P
lanning
Commission
E
dmond
P
lanning
Commission